Private International Law

Chapter 1: Introduction to Private International Law

  1. Hilton vs. Guyot, 159 US 113
  2. Nevsun Resources Ltd. Vs. Araya, 2020 SCC 5
  3. Abdullahi vs. Pfizer, 562 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2009)
  4. Hasegawa vs. Kitamura, GR No. 149177, November 23, 2007
  5. Small vs. United States, 544 U.S 385 (2005)
  6. Kiobel vs. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S.Ct. 1659 (2013)
  7. Jesner vs. Arab Bank, 138 S. Ct. 1386 (2018)
  8. Saudi Arabian Airlines vs Rebesencio, et al, GR No. 198587, January 14, 2015
  9. Bangladesh Bank vs. Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation, S.D.NY 2020

Chapter 2: Jurisdiction

  1. Gemperle vs. Schenker, 19 SCRA 45 (1967)
  2. Pennoyer vs. Neff, 95 US 714 (1878)
  3. International Shoe Co. vs. Washington, 326 US 310 (1945)
  4. Mullane vs. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company., et.al., 399 US 306 (1950)
  5. Shaffer vs. Heitner, 433 US 186 (1977)
  6. Perkins vs. Roxas 72 Phil 514 (1941)
  7. Heine vs. New York Insurance Company, 45 F2d 426 (1940)
  8. Wing On Company vs. Syyap, 64 O.G. 8311 (1967)
  9. Fleumer vs. Hix, 54 Phil 610 (1930)
  10. Philippine Trust Co. vs. Bohanan, 106 Phil 997 (1960)

  1. Aznar vs. Garcia, GR No. L-16749, January 31, 1963
  2. Bellis vs. Bellis, GR No. L-23678, June 6, 1967
  3. Pitzer College vs. Indian Harbor Insurance Company, 447 P.3d 669 (2019)
  4. Cadalin, et al vs. POEA Administrator, GR Nos. L-104776, 104911-14 and 105029-32, December 5, 1994
  5. Bank of America Nr. & Asia vs. American realty Corporation, GR No. 133876 December 29, 1999
  6. Dacasin vs. Dacasin, GR. No. 168785, February 5, 2010
  7. Kearney vs. Salomon Smith Barney, 137 P.3d 914 (2006)
  8. Butler vs. Adoption Media, LLC, 486 F. Supp 2d 1022 (2007)
  9. Francisco v. Stolt Achievement MT (2002)
  10. Hancock v. Watson 962 So. 2d 627 (2007)
  11. Wildvalley Shipping vs. Court of Appeals, GR No. 119602 October 6, 2000
  12. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. vs. Guerrero, GR No. 136804 February 19, 2003
  13. Edi-Staff Builders International vs. NLRC, GR No. 145587, October 26, 2007
  14. Norse Management Co. vs. National Seaman Board Scrivener's Error, GR No. L. 54204 Sep30,1982
  15. Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation vs. Sherman, GR No. 72494, August 11, 1989
  16. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. Vs. Shute, 499 U.S 585 (1990)

Chapter 4: Notice and Proof of Foreign Law
  1. PCIB vs. Escolin, 56 SCRA 266 (1974)
  2. In Re: Estate of Johnson, 39 Phil 156 (1918)
  3. Walton vs. Arabian American Oil, Co., 233 F. 2nd F4 (1956)
  4. Leary vs. Gledhill, 8 N.J. 260, 84 A. 2d 725 (1951)
  5. Zalamea vs. Court of Appeals, 228 SCRA 27 (1993)
  6. Miciano vs. Brimo, 50 Phil 867 (1924)
  7. Suntay vs. Suntay, 95 Phil 500 (1952)
  8. CIR vs. Fisher, 1 SCRA 93 (1961)
  9. Board of Commissioners vs. Dela Rosa, 197 SCRA 858 (1991)
  10. Pakistan International Airlines Corporation vs. Ople, 190 SCRA 90 (1990)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Equality and Human Rights: The United Nations and Human Rights System (September 16, 2023)

Sovereign Equality of States/Principle of sovereign equality UN Charter of 1945 All states are equal before international law no matter the size of their territory, population, economy or military. All states have equal rights and duties under international law, and that no state has the right to interfere in the internal affairs of another state. Positive Consequences: All states have a voice in international affairs .   All states have the opportunity to participate in international organizations and to negotiate and conclude treaties. This helps to ensure that the interests of all states are represented in the development of international law and policy. No state has the right to interfere in the internal affairs of another state.  This helps to protect the sovereignty of all states and to prevent the use of force or coercion to achieve political objectives. States have the right to develop their own political, economic, and social systems without interference from othe...
Read more

Commercial Laws 1: R.A. No. 11057 — Personal Property Security Act

  Commercial Law TITLE XVI Personal Property Security Act Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises are sources of growth and innovation. They contribute to and benefit from future growth. Their increased participation in global trade "can have significant impact in reducing poverty through employment creation, productivity improvements and economies of scale." Congress passed the Personal Property Security Act in order to provide Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) more access to "credit at the least cost through the establishment of a unified and modern legal framework for securing obligations with personal property ." It was explained:  According to the 2015 Philippine Statistics Authority data, there are 896,839 micro-small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) that established in the Philippines.  These MSMEs generated a total of 4,784,870 jobs in 2015 versus 2,181,819 for the large enterprises.  This indicates that the MSMEs contributed almost 61 % o...
Read more

Land Title and Deeds: Chapter 1 — What Lands are Capable of Being Registered

Chapter I What Lands are Capable of Being Registered All lands in the Philippines are presumed to be lands of the public domain, and therefore, owned by the State. This rule finds support in Section 2, Article XII of the 1987 Constitution:  Section 2 . All lands of the public domain , waters, minerals, coal, petroleum, and other mineral oils, all forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests or timber, wildlife, flora and fauna, and other natural resources are owned by the State . With the exception of agricultural lands, all other natural resources shall not be alienated. The exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources shall be under the full control and supervision of the State. The State may directly undertake such activities, or it may enter into co-production, joint venture, or production-sharing agreements with Filipino citizens, or corporations or associations at least 60 per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens. Such agreements may be fo...
Read more