Case Digest: Atienza vs. Saluta, GR No. 233413, June 17, 2019
Evidence | Rule 130 Reyes J. Jr., J. Petitioner: Celia R. Atienza Respondent: Noel Sacramento Saluta Facts: Respondent Noel Sacramento Saluta claimed he was hired as a company driver by CRV Corporation and was assigned to drive for the petitioner Celia R. Atienza , receiving a monthly salary of ₱9,000. On December 11, 2014, a vehicular accident occurred and the respondent was required to pay ₱15,000.00 for the damages. His driver's license was confiscated, and he was issued a Temporary Operator's Permit (TOP). On December 23, 2014, the respondent requested time off to renew his expired license, but the petitioner allegedly refused, leading to a misunderstanding. The respondent believed he had been verbally terminated when the petitioner said that "kung hindi ka makakapag-drive ngayon, mabuti pa maghiwalay na tayo." Respondent filed a complaint against CRV Corporation and the petitioner, claiming illegal dismissal and other labor-related issues. The petitioner ar...