Case Digest: Calasanz v. Comm, 144 SCRA 664
Taxation Law | Income Tax The Calasanz spouses inherited a large tract of land, subdivided and extensively developed it into a residential subdivision, and sold the lots over time while reporting the gains as capital gains. The Supreme Court held that the gains were ordinary income taxable in full because the taxpayers’ activities constituted engagement in the real estate business, converting the inherited property into ordinary assets. Spouses Tomas and Ursula Calasanz were assessed deficiency income tax and real estate dealer’s tax after the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) reclassified their income from the sale of subdivided land as ordinary income rather than capital gains . Ursula Calasanz inherited a large agricultural land (about 1.678 million square meters) in Cainta, Rizal, which she subdivided into smaller lots, introduced improvements such as roads, drainage, gutters, and lighting, and sold to the public at a profit. In their 1957 income tax return, the petitioners rep...