Case Digest: Cha vs. CA (227 SCRA 690) Aug 18, 1997
Insurance Law | Insurable Interest Spouses Nilo Cha and Stella Uy-Cha leased commercial premises from CKS Development Corporation for one year. Lease contract stipulated that: Lessees cannot insure their goods against fire without lessor’s written consent . If insured without consent, the policy is deemed assigned to the lessor (CKS). Despite this, the Cha spouses insured their merchandise for ₱500,000 with United Insurance without CKS’s consent. On the day the lease expired, a fire occurred in the leased premises. CKS demanded that United pay the insurance proceeds directly to it based on the lease stipulation. United refused; CKS filed a complaint against United and the Cha spouses. RTC: Ruled in favor of CKS; CA: Affirmed (with modification). Whether the lease stipulation automatically assigning fire insurance proceeds to CKS is valid . Fire insurance is a contract of indemnity . Under Sec. 18, Insurance Code , insurance is enforceable only for one with an insurable interest . ...