Local Government Code

 

  1. San Juan v Civil Service Commission, GR No. 92299, April 19 1991
  2. Pimentel v Aguirre, Jr., GR No. 132988, July 19, 2000
  3. Municipality of Jimenez v Baz, Jr., GR No. 105746, December 2, 1996
  4. Alvarez, et al. v Guingina, Jr., et al., GR No. 118303, January 31, 1996
  5. Orillo, et al. v COMELEC, GR No. 93054, December 4, 1990
  6. Miranda, et al. v Aguirre, GR No. 133064, Septmber 16, 1999
  7. Agustin v Edu, GR No. L-49112, Feb. 2, 1979
  8. City Gov't. of Quezon City, et al. v Ericta, GR No L-34915, June 24, 1983
  9. Ynot v Intermediate Appellate Court, GR No. 74457, March 20, 1987
  10. City of Manila v Laguio, Jr., GR No. 118127, April 12, 2005
  11. Macasiano v Diokno, GR No. 97764, August 10, 1992
  12. Velasco v Villegas, GR No. L-24153, Feb. 14, 1983
  13. Binay v Domingo, GR No. 92389, Sept. 11 1991
  14. Sta. Rosa Realty Dev't. Corp. v CA, GR No. 112526, March 16, 2005
  15. Municipality of Paranaque v. V.M. Realty Corporation, G.R. No. 127820, July 20, 1998
  16. Dela Paz Masikip v. The City of Pasig, et al., G.R. No. 136349, January 23, 2006
  17. Estate or Heirs of the Late Ex-Justice Jose B.L. Reyes v. City of Manila, G.R. Nos. 132431 AND 137146, February 13, 20044. 
  18. Mandanas, et al. v. Executive Secretary Ochoa, et al., G.R. No. 199802 / G.R. No. 208488, April 10, 2019

  1. Tan v. COMELEC, GR No. 73155, July 11, 1986
  2. Padilla v COMELEC, GR No. 103328, Oct 19, 1992
  3. Tobias v Abalos, GR No. L-114783, Dec 8, 1994
  4. Umali v COMELEC, GR No. 203974, Apr 22, 2014
  5. Del Rosario v COMELEC, GR No. 247610, Mar 10, 2020
  6. Penera v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 181613, November 25, 2009

ELECTIVE OFFICIALS

Fugitive from Justice
1. Marquez, Bienvenido v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 112889, April 18, 1995
2. Rodriguez v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 120099, July 24, 1996

Residence v. Domicile
3. Romualdez-Marcos v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 119976, Sept. 18, 1995 (248 SCRA
300)
4. Frivaldo v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 120295, June 28, 1996
5.  Labo v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 86564, August 1, 1989

Term v. Tenure
6.  Guekeko v. Santos, G.R. No. L-128, March 2, 1946
7.  Borja v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 133495, September 3, 1998
8.  Estrada v. Desierto, G.R. No. 146710-15, April 3, 2001 (356 SCRA 108)
9.  Adormeo v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 147927, February, 2002
10. Socrates v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 154512, November 12, 2002
11.  Latasa v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 154829, December 10, 2003
12.  Abundo v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 201716, January 8, 2013
13.  Tallado v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 246679, March 2, 2021

Age Qualification
14. Garvida v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 124893, April 18, 1997

Rule on Succession
15.  Labo v. COMELEC, supra
16. Ortega v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 105384, July 3, 1992
17. Borja v. COMELEC, supra
18. Reyes v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 120905, March 7, 1996
19. Salaysay v. Castro, G.R. No. L-9669, January 31, 1956
20.  Fariñas v. Barra, et al., G.R. No. 116763, April 19, 1996
21. Navarro v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 141307, March 29, 2001

Substitution
22. Talaga, Ruby v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 196804, October 9, 2012

Hold-Over Capacity
23. Sambarani v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 160427, September 15, 2004

Nuisance candidates
24.  Marquez, Norman v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 244274, September 3, 2019

Bonus case:
Penera v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 181613, November 25, 2009


Recall
25. Paras vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 123169, November 4, 1996
26. Angobung vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 126576, March 5, 1997
27. Socrates vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 154512, supra


ADMINISTRATIVE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND PROCEFURES ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS 

– Three-Fold Liability Rule
– Grounds for administrative disciplinary actions against elective local officials
– Categories of/Grounds for suspension

1. Hagad vs. Gozodadole, G.R. No. 108072, December 12, 1995
2. Festejo vs. Crisologo, G.R. No. L-25853, July 30, 1966
3. Lacson vs. Roque, G.R. No. L-6225, January10, 1953
4. Palma, Sr. vs. Fortich, G.R. No. L-59679, January 29, 1987
5. Bunye vs. Escareal, G.R. No. 110216, September 10, 1993
6. Bautista vs. Peralta, G.R. No. L-21967, September 29, 1966
7. Bolastig vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 110503, August 4, 1994
8. Deloso vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 86899-903, May 15, 1989
9. Yabut vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 111304, June 17, 1994
10. Carpio-Morales vs. C.A., G.R. Nos. 217126-27, November 10, 2015
11. Crebello vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 232325, April 10, 2019
12. Pablico vs. Villapando, G.R. No. 147870, July 31, 2002
13. Joson vs. Torres, G.R. No. 131255, May 20,1998
14. Mendoza vs. Laxina, Sr., G.R. No. 146875, July 14, 2003
15. Llamas vs. Orbos, G.R. No. 99031, October 15, 1991


KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY

1. Morata vs Go, G.R. No. 62339, October 27, 1983
2. Vda de Borromeo vs. Pogoy, G.R. No.63277, November 29, 1983
3. Cecilia Ledesma vs CA, G.R. No. 96914, July 23, 1992
4. Montoya vs Escayo, G.R. No. 82211-12, March 21 1989
5. Galuba vs Laureta, G.R. No. 71901, January 29, 1988
6. Gegare vs CA, G.R. No. 83907, September 13, 1989
7. Royales vs IAC, G.R. No. 65072, January 31, 1984
8. Fernandez vs Militante, G.R. No. L-59801, May 31, 1988
9. San Miguel Village School vs Pundogar, G.R. No. 80264, May 31, 1989
10. Abalos vs CA, G.R. No. 94436, April 30, 1991
11. Alisugay vs Hon. Cagampang, Jr., et al., G.R. No. L-69334, July 28, 1986
12. Zamora vs Heirs of Izquierdo, G.R. No. 146195, November 18, 2004
13. Espino vs Legarda, G.R. No. 149266, March 17, 2006
14. Aquino vs Aure G.R. No. 153567, February 18, 2008
15. Miguel vs Montaez, G.R. No. 191336, January 25, 2012
16. Agbayani vs CA, G.R. No. 183632, June 25, 2012





Popular posts from this blog

Equality and Human Rights: The United Nations and Human Rights System (September 16, 2023)

Sovereign Equality of States/Principle of sovereign equality UN Charter of 1945 All states are equal before international law no matter the size of their territory, population, economy or military. All states have equal rights and duties under international law, and that no state has the right to interfere in the internal affairs of another state. Positive Consequences: All states have a voice in international affairs .   All states have the opportunity to participate in international organizations and to negotiate and conclude treaties. This helps to ensure that the interests of all states are represented in the development of international law and policy. No state has the right to interfere in the internal affairs of another state.  This helps to protect the sovereignty of all states and to prevent the use of force or coercion to achieve political objectives. States have the right to develop their own political, economic, and social systems without interference from othe...
Read more

Election Laws: Requirements Before Election

REQUIREMENTS BEFORE ELECTION A. Registration Registration of Voters The right of a citizen to vote is necessarily conditioned upon certain procedural requirements he must undergo, among others, the process of registration. Registration regulates the exercise of the right of suffrage .  It is not a qualification for such right.  R.A. No. 8189, the Voter's Registration Act of 1996 (approved June 11, 1996) : Sec. 2. Declaration of Policy. It is the policy of the State to systematize the present method of registration in order to establish a clean, complete, permanent and updated list of voters. Sec. 3. Definition of Terms. – As used in this Act: Registration refers to the act of accomplishing and filing of a sworn application for registration by a qualified voter before the election officer of the city or municipality wherein he resides and including the same in the book of registered voters upon approval by the Election Registration Board; Registration Record refers to an ...
Read more

Special Rules and Proceedings: Rule 75

Special Rules and Proceedings RULE 75 Production of Will; Allowance of Will Necessary Section 1. Allowance necessary. Conclusive as to execution. — No will shall pass either real or personal estate  unless it is proved and allowed in the proper court.  Subject to the right of appeal,  such allowance of the will shall be conclusive as to its due execution. Probate  A special proceeding to establish the validity of a will. Kinds of wills A will has been defined as a species of conveyance whereby a person is permitted, with the formalities prescribed by law, to control to a certain degree thze disposition of his estate after his death.   Under the Civil Code, there are two kinds of wills which a testator may execute.  The first is the notarial will , which must be acknowledged before a notary public by a testator and the attesting witness and is governed by Articles 804 to 809 of the Civil Code. The second is the holographic will , which Article 810 ...
Read more